HEX Smart Contract Audit
CoinFabrik was asked to audit the contracts for the HEX project. Firstly, we will provide a summary of our discoveries and secondly, we will show the details of our findings.
CoinFabrik was asked to audit the contracts for the HEX project. Firstly, we will provide a summary of our discoveries and secondly, we will show the details of our findings.
CoinFabrik was asked to audit the contracts for the Money on Chain RRC20 project. Firstly, we will provide a summary of our discoveries and secondly, we will show the details of our findings.
CoinFabrik was asked to audit the contracts for the Bitpara project. Firstly, we will provide a summary of our discoveries and secondly, we will show the details of our findings.
The contracts audited are from the Bitpara repository at https://github.com/sottile27/bitpara
CoinFabrik was asked to audit the contracts for the Money On Chain project. We will provide an executive summary of our discoveries, a short description of the project, the methodology used, the details of our findings and will finish with our conclusion of the code audited.
CoinFabrik was asked to audit the contracts for the Timvi project. Firstly, we will provide a summary of our discoveries and secondly, we will show the details of our findings.
The purpose of this document is to offer different alternatives to reduce gas cost in certain functions of the Money on Chain project. These functions when called in a transaction may reach the block gas limit, rendering them unable to be called.
Every month several important smart contract audits are performed by blockchain security companies like us. It is important to stay up to date with the latest findings in order to learn and improve protection processes. Following we will describe three recent and interesting findings:
This is the second of a series of four audits we performed for MOC: Second Audit To solve Bitcoin’s volatility
CoinFabrik was asked to audit the contracts for the Nahmii Token project. Firstly, we will provide a summary of our discoveries and secondly, we will show the details of our findings.
A security audit is a process in which a client subjects his or her smart contracts to a review, in which one or more auditors search and document vulnerabilities that may alter the project correct functionality. The main idea of this post is to specify the process of audits, who belongs to them and how the different individuals interact from the moment the client reaches us to the moment we end communication with them.
After our articles Smart Contract Auditing: Human vs. Machine and Auditing Solidity code with Slither we decided to test another static analysis tool from ChainSecurity called Securify.
CoinFabrik has been hired to audit the EasyPool smart contracts. We start this report writing a summary with the smart contracts provided by the client and a list of the analysis methods used to audit the contracts. Next, we will make a summary of the files we analysed and the public facing functions provided by the ProPool contract.